Smith + Malek
contact@smithmalek.com (208) 473-7009 (509) 606-1500
×
  • Our Firm
    • Careers
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • General Counsel
      • Contract Law
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Human Resources Law
    • Corporate Litigation
      • Appellate Law
    • Healthcare Law
  • Blog
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
Business

Deadlock in Closely Held Corporations

Jul 20, 2018

Understanding Deadlock in Closely Held Corporations

Deadlock in a closely held corporation stops a business in its tracks. Deadlock happens when a key decision can not be made because there is not enough votes to make the decision. This occurs most often in two situations.

Situations That Cause Deadlock

The first situation is when all the shareholders have the same voting power. Suppose there are four shareholders. Each shareholder owns 2,500 shares. If it takes a majority to take action, this means, three shareholders must vote on favor of a decision. If they do not, then there is deadlock.

The second situation where deadlock arises is when a higher than majority is required to make a decision. Suppose there are 3 shareholders. Shareholder 1 owns 1,000 shares, shareholder 2 owns 2,000 shares and shareholder 3 owns 2,000 shares. Shareholder A vote to merge with another company requires a supermajority vote of 66%. If shareholder 1 and shareholder 2 support the merger, it still can’t happen because the vote would only have 60% approval.

Get Tailored Solutions for Your Closely Held Corporation – Contact Us!

Contact Us Today

Solutions to Resolve Deadlock

One way to solve deadlock is to have a shareholder agreement that has a solution. There are bunch of different ways to resolve deadlock. One way to flip a coin if there is a decision that has only one or two choices. Since a flip of a coin is random and shareholders typically don’t want to leave their futures up to chance, they will find a way to resolve the deadlock before the coin flip.

Another way to deal with deadlock is to present the situation to a neutral party to make the decision. The neutral party listens to the pros and cons of each side and makes a decision that binds the shareholders. This way works well if the decision is fairly simple. However, if it is a complex decision, the cost of educating a neutral party may exceed the benefit.

One other way to deal with deadlock is to require the parties to meet and negotiate. If the shareholders do not resolve the deadlock in the meeting, then one shareholder can offer to purchase the shares owned by the other shareholders.

The purchase price is negotiated or set by an appraisal. If the other shareholders sell, then the purchasing shareholder can move forward. If the selling shareholders refuse to sell, then they lose their votes on the matter that caused the deadlock. This allows the other shareholder to move forward. If all the shareholders make an offer to buy the other’s shares, then the highest offer wins and he buys the shares.

Sample Deadlock Clause

This is a sample clause that we have used to address deadlock with a put.

Deadlock. If Directors or shareholders arrive at a deadlock in the management of the Company, Shareholders shall enter into a thirty (30) day period of good faith negotiations to resolve the dispute. If, after thirty (30) days, the deadlock remains then a shareholder in dispute shall then have the right to call no less than the entirety of the shares of the other shareholder. Such call shall be subject to the valuation by appraisal. If a shareholder declines to sell his or her shares pursuant to such a call, then such shareholder’s vote shall be disregarded as to the matter causing a deadlock. If there is a mutual call of shares, the shareholder willing to pay the highest price shall either purchase such shares or shall prevail as to the matter causing the deadlock.

Deadlock in Closely Held Corporations
Topics Covered Here
Contents hide
Understanding Deadlock in Closely Held Corporations
Situations That Cause Deadlock
Solutions to Resolve Deadlock
Sample Deadlock Clause

Related Articles

How to Prepare Your Business for a Merger or Acquisition

In the dynamic markets of Washington and Idaho, business owners face exciting but complex decisions when it comes time to sell a company or join forces with another. If...

Read more
How to Conduct a Legal Risk Assessment Before an Acquisition

Buying or merging with another company can be exciting and nerve-wracking. In Washington and Idaho, with industries ranging from tech startups to manufacturing and agriculture businesses, mergers and acquisitions...

Read more
How to Enforce Non-Compete Agreements in Idaho: A Comprehensive Overview for Business Owners

Non-compete agreements are designed to protect a company’s intellectual property, client relationships, and competitive edge.  The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent attempts to regulate them have created some confusion...

Read more

Ready to work with us?

We are committed to keeping you up to date on legal matters that may impact you. We send 1-2 informative emails per month.
Consent: By hitting submit, you understand that we do not become your attorneys. That only happens if we both agree to the consult.(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Our Firm
  • Our Team
  • Careers
  • Our Blog
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Smith + Malek. All Rights Reserved.

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy